Monday, July 9, 2012

A Flexy thought of Sudan Revolts 16 June 2012



NOT THE 1ST, YET NOT THE END OF THIS ONE TOO.

Sudanese people can live and work for life, but in order for that Nowadays to be reality easily, government (a system made by the people to SERVE the people) has to be there to facilitate things for the people.

Islamic view on governance, stresses on it being chosen by the people. So, if the people choose the down-fall of the government, shouldn't that request be full-filled? Remember, it is a system MADE by the PEOPLE, if it is not serving the purpose, to get rid of the current one and to replace it with another one should be BY the PEOPLE.

People, people as in one nation, not separating them tribally. That was NOT  Islamic from the Sudanese Government to apply on OFFICIAL FORMS, that was very low. To prove the failure of such tribalism , One country into Two countries, enough spoken..!!

Bashir's regime gives the example of Czechoslovakia going to The Czech Republic and Slovakia, I would rather make them realise the countries formed by many states, willayahs, or even emirates, united as one.

Government are there as representative of the nation for the country's transactions with the world, so that the people can easily find daily basic needs, simple things, water and food. After the announcement of  Sudan's President Omar Al-Bashir swore in six ministers to join the government amid recently-imposed austerity measures that sparked un-precdented public protests, because the simple needs are taking from them. Now they have to go more than five tries in order to find bread. Not Islamic from the Sudanese Government to do.

Reasons for me saying that it was NOT Islamic:
  • The regime keeps denying the existence of own nation's people, not foreigners, not only street on non-street kids on protests, because
  • The regime is not qualified to solve Economical problems, because
  • The regime is not qualified to negotiation in deals between country-to-country, because
  • The focus is always War, Spilling Blood, and Destroying villages and history, and because
  • When the regime enters a war it is NOT implemented in an Islamic way, lastly because
  • The regime's denial of admitting a mistake, like failing to govern and let another person from the people to take over serving the people, failing to lose with dignity, is totally NOT ISLAMIC.



Yet after the above, the government (Bashir' regime) still speaks about future activities on changing the Constitution into a 100% Islamic, and improving things Economically, and specially the poor ones..... Wait, all of them or specific tribes?


The fact that Bashir's regime still insists on holding on to power, is NOT Islamic at all. Yet the regime speaks of Islam, as if they are the one who ONLY know Islam.


First glimpse of the Un-Islamic activities of Bashir's regime.